Cover Image

Legal Foundations of Land Use Planning : Textbook-Casebook and Materials on Planning Law.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rose, Jerome G.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Somerset : Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
Subjects:
City planning and redevelopment law > United States.
Electronic books.
Online Access:View fulltext via EzAccess
Table of Contents:
  • Cover
  • Half Title
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • Chapter One - THE LAW AS AN INSTRUMENT OF URBAN PLANNING
  • A. Philosophical Limitations
  • 1. Certainty in the Law and Freedom
  • 2. Certainty in the Law and Justice
  • Neiderman v. Brodsky
  • B. Historical Limitations
  • C. Constitutional Limitations
  • 1. Federalism
  • U.S. v. Certain Lands in Lousiville
  • 2. Separation of Powers
  • Thibodeaux v. Comeaux
  • Commonwealth, ex rel. Carroll v. Tate
  • 3. Impairment of the Obligation of Contracts
  • U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. New Jersey
  • In re Department of Buildings
  • 4. Search and Seizure
  • 5. Due Process of Law
  • a. Substantive Due Process
  • Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher
  • Safer v. City of Jacksonville
  • b. Procedural Due Process
  • Shaugnessy v. Mezei
  • 6. Equal Protection of the Laws
  • Rhonda Realty Corp. v. Lawton
  • Property Taxes, School Financing and Equal Protection, by Jerome G. Rose
  • 7. Private Enterprise
  • Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority
  • Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. DeGroff Enterprises, Inc.,
  • Chapter Two - ZONING
  • A. Relationship to Community Planning
  • N.J. Master Plan
  • California Master Plan
  • Baker v. City of Milwaukie
  • B. Pre-Zoning Land Use Controls
  • 1. Nuisance Doctrine
  • Hulbert v. California Portland Cement Co.
  • 2. Private Agreements
  • Rhue v. Cheyenne Homes, Inc.
  • C. Constitutional Issues
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
  • Shepard v. Skaneateles
  • LaSalle National Bank c. County of Cook
  • D. Legislative Issues
  • California Code
  • Princeton, N.J. Code
  • E. Regulation of Use, Bulk and Density
  • 1. Regulation of Use
  • a. Exclusion of Schools
  • Union Free School Dist. v. Village of Hewlett Bay Park
  • b. Exclusion of Churches
  • Congregation Temple Israel v. City of Creve Coeur
  • c. Accessory Uses.
  • Trenton Zoning Ordinance
  • Paul v. Board of Zoning Appeals
  • d. Signs
  • Cromwell v. Ferrier
  • 2. Regulation of Bulk
  • a. Set-back Requirements
  • Trenton Zoning Ordinance
  • Robyns v. City of Dearborn
  • b. Floor Area Ratio
  • San Francisco City Planning Code
  • c. Open Space Ratio
  • d. Sky Exposure Plane
  • N.Y.C. Zoning Handbook
  • 3. Density Regulations
  • a. Minimum Lot Size
  • Trenton Zoning Ordinance
  • b. Minimum Building Size
  • Lionshead Lake v. Wayne Twp.
  • F. Zoning Administration
  • 1. The Zoning Board of Adjustment
  • California Statutes
  • 2. Variances
  • a. The Standard State Enabling Act Provisions
  • Otto v. Steinhilber
  • b. The N.J. Land Use Law
  • DeSimone v. Greater Englewood Housing Corp. No. 1
  • 3. Special Exceptions - Conditional Uses
  • Kotrich v. County of Du Page
  • 4. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance - Spot Zoning
  • Fasano v. County Comm. of Washington Co.
  • Board of Supervisors of Fairfax Co. v. Snell Construction Corp.
  • 5. Nonconforming Uses
  • Trenton Zoning Ordinance
  • Town of Seabrook v. D'Agata
  • City of Los Angeles v. Gage
  • 6. Vested Rights
  • Cooper v. City of Greensburg
  • G. Devices For Zoning Flexibility
  • 1. Floating Zones
  • Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown
  • Rockhill v. Chesterfield Twp.
  • 2. Contract Zoning - Conditional Zoning
  • Church v. Town of Islip
  • Houston Petroleum Co. v. Automotive Products Credit Ass'n
  • 3. Incentive Zoning
  • San Francisco City Planning Code, Sec. 122.3
  • 4. Performance Zoning
  • 5. Special Districts - Mixed Use Districts
  • a. Erogenous Zones
  • Young v. American Mini Theatres
  • b. Theatre Districts
  • 6. Cluster Zoning
  • Princeton Township Code 23-31
  • Chapter Three - EXCLUSIONARY ZONING AND MANAGED GROWTH
  • Introduction
  • A. The Rate of Growth of the Community: Timed Sequential Development
  • 1. Rate of Growth.
  • Construction Industry Assoc. of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma
  • 2. Timed Sequential Development
  • Golden v. Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo
  • 3. Obligations of a Public Utility
  • Robinson v. City of Boulder
  • B. Social and Economic Composition of the Community
  • 1. Exclusion of Unrelated Persons (Groupies)
  • Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas
  • Kirsch Holding co. v. Borough of Manasquan
  • 2. Exclusion of Non-Elderly
  • Taxpayers Assoc. of Weymouth Twp., Inc. v. Weymouth Township
  • 3. Exclusion of the Handicapped
  • Berger v. State of New Jersey
  • C. The Mount Laurel Decision and its Progeny
  • 1. Analysis of the Decision and the New Legal Issues
  • Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel
  • The Mount Laurel Decision: Is It Based On Wishful Thinking?, by Jerome G. Rose
  • 2. A Partial Retreat From Mount Laurel
  • Oakwood at Madison v. The Township of Madison
  • Oakwood at Madison: A Tactical Retreat By the N.J. Supreme Court, by Jerome G. Rose
  • A New Test For Exclusionary Zoning: Does It "Preclude the Opportunity" For "Least Cost" Housing? by Jerome G. Rose
  • After the Recent N.J. Supreme Court Cases: What Is the Status of Suburban Zoning? by Jerome G. Rose
  • 3. An Alternative to the Mount Laurel "Fair Share" Approach
  • Berenson v. Town of New Castle
  • D. Special Problems of Racial Discrimination
  • 1. Judicial Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants
  • Shelley v. Kraemer
  • 2. State Protection of Private Discrimination
  • Reitman v. Mulkey
  • 3. Requirement of Zoning Referenum
  • James v. Valtierra
  • City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
  • 4. Thirteenth Amendment: Badges of Slavery
  • Jones v. Mayer
  • 5. Fair Housing Laws
  • 6. Discriminatory Effect Without Discriminatory Intent
  • Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
  • E. Federal Funding and Exclusionary Zoning
  • Chapter Four - SUBDIVISION REGULATION
  • A. Introduction
  • B. The Planning Board - Planning Commission
  • C. Subdivision Procedure
  • 1. Pre-Application Discussion
  • 2. Preliminary Plat Approval
  • a. Effect of Preliminary Plat Approval
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • 3. Final Plat Approval
  • Sketch Plat
  • Preliminary Plat
  • Final Plat
  • D. Questions to Be Considered in Subdivision Review
  • N.J. Administrative Guide to Subdivison Regulation
  • E. Enforcement of Subdivision Regulations
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • F. Statutory and Constitutional Validity
  • 1. General Principles
  • Ayers v. City of Los Angeles
  • Wald Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County
  • 2. Schools and Parks
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • Krughoff v. City of Naperville
  • 3. Cash Fee in Lieu of Dedication
  • Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale
  • West Park Ave., Inc. v. Ocean Twp.
  • 4. Offsite Improvements
  • N.J. Land Use Law
  • Chapter Five - SITE PLAN REVIEW, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL MAP
  • A. Site Plan Review
  • 1. Criteria and Standards of Approval
  • Princeton, N.J. Land Use Ordinance
  • 2. Application Procedure
  • Princeton, N.J. Land Use Ordinance
  • 3. Legal Issues
  • Sun Oil Co. v. City of Pittsburgh
  • McCrann v. Town of Bloomfield
  • B. Planned Unit Development
  • 1. Introductory Description
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • 2. Legal Issues
  • C. Official Map
  • 1. Introductory Description
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • 2. Legal Issues
  • a. Is There a "Deprivation of Property?
  • Headley v. Rochester
  • Miller v. City of Beaver Falls
  • b. Compensation For Temporary Deprivation of Use
  • Lomarch v. Mayor of Englewoood
  • N.J. Municipal Land Use Law
  • Chapter Six - EMINENT DOMAIN
  • A. Nature of the Power
  • B. What Is A Taking of Property?
  • Horst v. Housing Auth. of County of Scotts Bluff.
  • Washington Market Ent. v. City of Trenton
  • C. What Is a Public Use?
  • 1. Historic Development of the Expansive Definition
  • Connata v. City of New York
  • Berman v. Parker
  • 2. Excess Condemnation
  • 3. Advance Acquisition: Land Banking
  • 4. Open Space Preservation
  • D. What Is Just Compensation?
  • 1. Comparable Sales
  • State of Louisiana v. Crow
  • 2. Capitalization of Income
  • Denver Urban Renewal Autho. v. Cook
  • State v. Bare
  • 3. Reproduction Cost Less Depreciation: Specialties
  • Keator v. State
  • Bartage v. Manchester Housing Auth.
  • 4. Highest and Best Use
  • Masheter v. Ohio Holding Co.
  • 5. Partial Taking
  • 6. Consequential Damages
  • Lucas v. State
  • E. Acquisition Procedure and Policy
  • 1. Due Process Requirements
  • 2. Federal Acquisition Policy
  • Federal Uniform Real Property Acquisitions Policy
  • Chapter Seven - TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
  • A. Introduction to the Concept of TDR
  • The Transfer of Development Rights: A Preview of an Evolving Concept, by Jerome G. Rose
  • A Proposal For The Separation and Marketability of Development Rights as a Technique To Preserve Open Space, by Jerome G. Rose
  • B. Some Unresolved Legal Problems
  • Fred French Inv. Co. Inc. v. City of New York
  • The French Case and the Future of TDR Programs, by Jerome G. Rose
  • C. Variations On the TDR Theme
  • Transfer of Development Credits (TDC): A New Form of Cluster Zoning, by William Queale, Jr.
  • Index.

Similar Items