Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules /
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from th...
Main Authors: | Eemeren, Frans. (Author), Garssen, Bart. (Author), Meuffels, Bert. (Author) |
---|---|
Corporate Author: | SpringerLink (Online service) |
Format: | Electronic |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands,
2009.
|
Series: | Argumentation Library,
16 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 |
Similar Items
-
Legal theory and the media of law /
by: Vesting, Thomas,
Published: (2018) -
Bird's engineering mathematics /
by: Bird, J. O.,
Published: (2021) -
Understanding writing transfer : implications for transformative student learning in higher education /
Published: (2017) -
Analysing sentences : an introduction to English syntax /
by: Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1948-
Published: (2016) -
Case studies in neuropalliative care /
Published: (2018)