Beyond Race, Sex, and Sexual Orientation : Legal Equality without Identity /

The conventional interpretation of equality under the law singles out certain groups or classes for constitutional protection: women, racial minorities, and gays and lesbians. The United States Supreme Court calls these groups 'suspect classes'. Laws that discriminate against them are gene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bedi, Sonu, (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Online Access:View fulltext via EzAccess
LEADER 02202nam a22003138i 4500
001 28111
003 UkCbUP
005 20160413044027.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 110516s2013||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 # # |a 9781139087643 (ebook) 
020 # # |z 9781107018358 (hardback) 
020 # # |z 9781107515406 (paperback) 
040 # # |a UkCbUP  |b eng  |c UkCbUP  |e rda 
050 0 0 |a KF4764  |b .B43 2013 
082 0 0 |a 342.7308/5  |2 23 
100 1 # |a Bedi, Sonu,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Beyond Race, Sex, and Sexual Orientation :  |b Legal Equality without Identity /  |c Sonu Bedi. 
246 3 # |a Beyond Race, Sex, & Sexual Orientation 
264 # 1 |a Cambridge :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2013. 
300 # # |a 1 online resource (292 pages) :  |b digital, PDF file(s). 
336 # # |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 # # |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 13 Apr 2016). 
520 # # |a The conventional interpretation of equality under the law singles out certain groups or classes for constitutional protection: women, racial minorities, and gays and lesbians. The United States Supreme Court calls these groups 'suspect classes'. Laws that discriminate against them are generally unconstitutional. While this is a familiar account of equal protection jurisprudence, this book argues that this approach suffers from hitherto unnoticed normative and political problems. The book elucidates a competing, extant interpretation of equal protection jurisprudence that avoids these problems. The interpretation is not concerned with suspect classes but rather with the kinds of reasons that are already inadmissible as a matter of constitutional law. This alternative approach treats the equal protection clause like any other limit on governmental power, thus allowing the Court to invalidate equality-infringing laws and policies by focusing on their justification rather than the identity group they discriminate against. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9781107018358 
856 4 0 |u https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087643  |z View fulltext via EzAccess