Exclusions from Patentability : How Far Has the European Patent Office Eroded Boundaries? /

Exclusions from Patentability reviews the history of the adoption of exclusions from patentability under the European Patent Convention since its first conception in 1949 through to its most recent revision. The analysis shows how other intellectual property treaties, such as UPOV, the Strasbourg Pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sterckx, Sigrid, (Author), Cockbain, Julian, (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Series:Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law ; 19.
Subjects:
Online Access:View fulltext via EzAccess
LEADER 02226nam a22003498i 4500
001 28082
003 UkCbUP
005 20160413044026.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 110304s2012||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 # # |a 9781139047623 (ebook) 
020 # # |z 9781107006942 (hardback) 
020 # # |z 9781107542624 (paperback) 
040 # # |a UkCbUP  |b eng  |c UkCbUP  |e rda 
050 0 0 |a KJC2725  |b .S74 2012 
082 0 0 |a 346.2404/86  |2 23 
100 1 # |a Sterckx, Sigrid,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Exclusions from Patentability :  |b How Far Has the European Patent Office Eroded Boundaries? /  |c Sigrid Sterckx, Julian Cockbain. 
264 # 1 |a Cambridge :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2012. 
300 # # |a 1 online resource (376 pages) :  |b digital, PDF file(s). 
336 # # |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 # |a Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law ;  |v 19 
500 # # |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 13 Apr 2016). 
520 # # |a Exclusions from Patentability reviews the history of the adoption of exclusions from patentability under the European Patent Convention since its first conception in 1949 through to its most recent revision. The analysis shows how other intellectual property treaties, such as UPOV, the Strasbourg Patent Convention, PCT, the EU Biotech Directive and TRIPS have affected the framing of the exclusions. Particular attention is given to those exclusions considered the most contentious (computer programmes, discoveries, medical treatments, life forms and agriculture) and those decisions which have been most influential in shaping the approaches by which the exclusions have been interpreted. The 'morality' exclusion and the interpretation of the exclusions are discussed critically and suggestions for coherent interpretation are made. 
650 # 0 |a European Patent Office 
700 1 # |a Cockbain, Julian,  |e author. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9781107006942 
830 # 0 |a Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law ;  |v 19. 
856 4 0 |u https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047623  |z View fulltext via EzAccess