Precedent in the United States Supreme Court
This volume presents a variety of both normative and descriptive perspectives on the use of precedent by the United States Supreme Court. It brings together a diverse group of American legal scholars, some of whom have been influenced by the Segal/Spaeth "attitudinal" model and some of wh...
Corporate Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Electronic |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Series: | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,
33 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View fulltext via EzAccess |
Table of Contents:
- Contributors
- Introduction; Christopher J. Peters
- 1 The Dialectic of Stare Decisis Doctrine; Colin Starger
- 2 Did Casey Strike Out? Following and Overruling Constitutional Precedents in the Supreme Court; Larry Alexander
- 3 An Epistemic Defense of Precedent; Deborah Hellman
- 4 Private-Rights Litigation and the Normative Foundations of Durable Constitutional Precedent ; Maxwell L. Stearns
- 5 Group Formation and Precedent; Neal Devins
- 6 Stare Decisis and the Selection Effect; Frederick Schauer
- 7 Methodological Stare Decisis and Constitutional Interpretation; Chad M. Oldfather
- 8 Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent; Randy J. Kozel
- 9 Originalism, Stare Decisis, and Constitutional Authority; Christopher J. Peters
- Index.