Bayesian Argumentation The practical side of probability /
Relevant to, and drawing from, a range of disciplines, the chapters in this collection show the diversity, and applicability, of research in Bayesian argumentation. Together, they form a challenge to philosophers versed in both the use and criticism of Bayesian models who have largely overlooked the...
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
| Series: | Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ;
362 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0 |
Table of Contents:
- Introduction: Frank Zenker. - Part 1
- The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation
- Chapter 1. Testimony and Argument: A Bayesian Perspective: Ulrike Hahn, Mike Oaksford and Adam J.L. Harris
- Chapter 2.�Why are we convinced�by the Ad Hominem�Argument?: Source Reliability or�Pragma-Dialectics: Mike Oaksford and Ulrike Hahn.-�Part�2. The Legal Domain.-Chapter 3.�A�survey of uncertainties�and their consequences�in�Probabilistic�Legal Argumentation: Matthias Grabmair and Kevin D. Ashley
- Chapter 4.�What went wrong in the case of�Sally Clark? A�case-study�of the use of�Statistical Evidence in�Court: Amid Pundik
- Part�3. Modeling Rational Agents
- Chapter�5.�A Bayesian Simulation Model�of�Group Deliberation: Erik J. Olsson
- Chapter 6.�Degrees of Justification, Bayes' Rule, and Rationality: Gregor Betz
- Chapter 7.�Argumentation�with�(Bounded) Rational Agents: Robert van Rooij and Kris de Jaeghery
- Part 4. Theoretical Issues
- Chapter 8. Reductio, Coherence, and the Myth of Epistemic Circularity: Tomoji Shogenji
- Chapter 9. On Argument Strength: Niki Pfeifer
- Chapter 10
- Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradox: Jonny Blamey
- References.