Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic

This compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilber...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Authors: van der Schaar, Maria. (Editor)
Format: Electronic
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Series:Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ; 31
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5137-8
Table of Contents:
  • Preface
  • Part 1. Constructivism, Judgement, and Reason
  • Chapter 1. Verificationism then and now: Per Martin-Lf̲
  • Chapter 2. Demonstrations versus Proofs, being an afterword to 'Constructions, Proofs and the meaning of Logical Constants': Gr̲an Sundholm
  • Chapter 3. Containment and Variation: Two Strands in the Development of Analyticity from Aristotle to Martin-Lf̲: Gr̲an Sundholm
  • Part 2. Judgement and Reason in the Seventeenth Century
  • Chapter 4. Decartes' Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Science: Elodie Cassan
  • Chapter 5. Striving, Oomph, and Intelligibility in Spinoza: Michael Della Rocca
  • Part 3. Kant, Neo-Kantianism, and Bolzano
  • Chapter 6. The Role of Wolff's Analysis of Judgments in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation: Johan Blok
  • Chapter 7. Windelband on 'Beurteilung<U+0019>: Arnaud Dewalque
  • Chapter 8. A Priori Knowledge in Bolzano; Conceptual Truths and Judgements: Stefan Roski
  • Part 4. Husserl, Frege and Russell
  • Chapter 9. Immanent and Real States of Affairs in Husserl's Early Theory of Judgement: Robin Rollinger
  • Chapter 10. Frege and Russell on Assertion: Jeremy Kelly.