Australasia and Pacific Ombudsman Institutions Mandates, Competences and Good Practice.
Commissioned by the International Ombudsman Institute (IOI), the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (BIM) in Vienna conducted a comparative analytical study on Ombudsman Institutions in the Australasia and Pacific region between January 2011 and April 2012. In Part 1, this book provides an a...
Corporate Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin, Heidelberg :
Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33896-0 |
Table of Contents:
- Part 1 Comparative Analysis of the Ombudsman Institutions: Introduction
- Legal Framework
- Mandate
- Powers
- Awareness and Outreach
- Good Practice Examples
- Part 2: Reports on Different Jurisdictions: Australia Commonwealth Ombudsman
- Australia Ombudsman New South Wales
- Australia Northern Territory Ombudsman
- Australia Queensland Ombudsman
- Australia South Australian Ombudsman
- Australia Tasmanian Ombudsman
- Australia Victorian Ombudsman
- Australia Western Australian Ombudsman
- Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region of China) Ombudsman
- Cook Islands Ombudsman
- New Zealand Ombudsmen
- Papua New Guinea Ombudsman Commission
- Samoa Ombudsman
- Taiwan Control Yuan
- Tonga Commissioner for Public Relations
- Vanuatu Ombudsman
- Annex.