Decision Theory and Choices: a Complexity Approach

In economics agents are assumed to choose on the basis of rational calculations aimed at the maximization of their pleasure or profit. Formally, agents are said to manifest transitive and consistent preferences in attempting to maximize their utility in the presence of several constraints. They oper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Authors: Faggini, Marisa. (Editor), Vinci, Concetto Paolo. (Editor)
Format: Electronic
Language:English
Published: Milano : Springer Milan : Imprint: Springer, 2010.
Series:New Economic Windows,
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8
LEADER 02947nam a22004815i 4500
001 11666
003 DE-He213
005 20130809131047.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 101226s2010 it | s |||| 0|eng d
020 # # |a 9788847017788  |9 978-88-470-1778-8 
024 7 # |a 10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8  |2 doi 
050 # 4 |a HB144 
050 # 4 |a QA269-272 
072 # 7 |a PBUD  |2 bicssc 
072 # 7 |a MAT011000  |2 bisacsh 
072 # 7 |a BUS069030  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 519  |2 23 
100 1 # |a Faggini, Marisa.  |e editor. 
245 1 0 |a Decision Theory and Choices: a Complexity Approach  |c edited by Marisa Faggini, Concetto Paolo Vinci.  |h [electronic resource] / 
264 # 1 |a Milano :  |b Springer Milan :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2010. 
300 # # |a X, 240 p.  |b online resource. 
336 # # |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 # # |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 # # |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 # # |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 # |a New Economic Windows,  |x 2039-411X 
520 # # |a In economics agents are assumed to choose on the basis of rational calculations aimed at the maximization of their pleasure or profit. Formally, agents are said to manifest transitive and consistent preferences in attempting to maximize their utility in the presence of several constraints. They operate according to the choice imperative: given a set of alternatives, choose the best. This imperative works well in a static and simplistic framework, but it may fail or vary when 'the best' is changing continuously. This approach has been questioned by a descriptive approach that springing from the complexity theory tries to give a scientific basis to the way in which individuals really choose, showing that those models of human nature is routinely falsified by experiments since people are neither selfish nor rational. Thus inductive rules of thumb are usually implemented in order to make decisions in the presence of incomplete and heterogeneous information sets; errors and biases are the natural counterpart of learning and adapting processes. The papers collected in this volume show that economic agents, individual or aggregate, do not conform to standard economic models, highlighting how a different framework complexity theory - could help to explain and understand the choice and decision process of economic agent. 
650 # 0 |a Mathematics. 
650 # 0 |a Economics. 
650 1 4 |a Mathematics. 
650 2 4 |a Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences. 
650 2 4 |a Complex Networks. 
650 2 4 |a Economic Systems. 
700 1 # |a Vinci, Concetto Paolo.  |e editor. 
710 2 # |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 # |t Springer eBooks 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9788847017771 
830 # 0 |a New Economic Windows,  |x 2039-411X 
856 4 0 |u https://ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8 
912 # # |a ZDB-2-SBE 
950 # # |a Business and Economics (Springer-11643)